Elon Musk, Wisconsin and Supreme Court
Digest more
Top News
Reactions and opinions
Impacts
CNN |
Elon Musk has thrust himself into the center of a state Supreme Court race in Wisconsin.
Yahoo |
Trump, who took office on January 20 for his second, non-consecutive White House term, has made allusions to seeking a third one but addressed it directly in a telephone interview with NBC News.
The New York Times |
Unauthorized immigrants pay more into Social Security and Medicare than they receive in federal benefits.
Read more on News Digest
Elon Musk’s prominent role in the most expensive judicial race in American history has helped turn Tuesday’s election into a battle over national politics.
The court could face cases on abortion, congressional maps and labor unions. With Tesla suing the state, Elon Musk is backing the conservative candidate who's received President Trump's endorsement.
Billionaire Elon Musk, standing in front of a massive American flag, told supporters on Sunday that voting in Wisconsin‘s April 1 Supreme Court election would not only help protect President Donald Trump‘s agenda but “affect the entire destiny of humanity.
14mon MSN
Musk and his political operatives have tried to shape the closely watched Wisconsin Supreme Court race in ways that are not immediately obvious.
17hon MSN
Musk’s heavy political involvement in the battle for control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court has made him a central figure in the race.
Elon Musk gave out $1 million checks on Sunday to two Wisconsin voters, declaring them spokespeople for his political group, ahead of a Wisconsin Supreme Court election that the tech billionaire cast as critical to President Donald Trump’s agenda and “the future of civilization.
The Hill on MSN50m
Trump touts Schimel ahead of Wisconsin Supreme Court votePresident Trump is promoting the conservative candidate, Judge Brad Schimel, ahead of Tuesday’s Wisconsin Supreme Court vote, which is seen as the first test of the second Trump term. “Brad
5don MSN
Just beyond 2025, you'll find a series of high court elections that together have perhaps even larger ramifications than who has ideological control.