A Texas pipeline company's lawsuit seeking potentially hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace was set to advance ...

A US oil pipeline operator's lawsuit seeking millions of dollars from Greenpeace for allegedly orchestrating a campaign of ...

A group of attorneys, activists and academics will be monitoring an upcoming trial between the developer of the Dakota Access ...

Undeterred, the pipeline company immediately filed a new complaint under North Dakota state law. Although that suit did not include an allegation that Greenpeace violated the state’s RICO statute, the ...

North Dakota does not. A spokesperson for Energy Transfer said in an email, “Our lawsuit against Greenpeace is not about free speech as they are trying to claim. It is about them not following ...

developer Energy Transfer accuses Greenpeace of defamation and orchestrating criminal behavior by Dakota Access pipeline protesters. Thousands of people traveled to south-central North Dakota in ...

Most of this seems intended to create a new narrative before the jury trial in Mandan, North Dakota, of Energy Transfer Partners v. Greenpeace. This is apparently how it works: if you want to spin ...

"Our lawsuit against Greenpeace is about them not following ... but Energy Transfer quickly refiled at the state level in North Dakota -- one of the minority of US states without anti-SLAPP ...

At stake is an open letter co-signed by Greenpeace International in 2016, calling on a dozen banks behind the construction of an oil pipeline in North Dakota to halt funding of the project.