NCAA, College Sports
Digest more
BYU’s new guard has said NIL was not the driving factor in his decision to transfer. Even if that isn’t the case, Drew hopes the House vs. NCAA settlement — which was recently approved and will soon allow programs to share revenue with athletes under a $20.5 million salary cap —will bring new balance to offseasons.
While Buddie is optimistic about the future of college athletics, he’s not naive. The effectiveness of this new era will come down to how much entities like Deloitte and the College Sports Commission will actually be able to monitor and identify NIL deals over $600 that go against the rules.
As colleges prepare for sweeping changes tied to the NCAA's $2.8 billion NIL settlement, proposed scholarship and roster limits will dampen college opportunities for high school athletes.
Sam Webb and Steve Lorenz talk summer NIL and NCAA settlement in Michigan LB recruiting
A federal judge’s final approval of the NCAA’s $2.8 billion settlement with student-athletes won’t quell all the antitrust threats for the sports organization as it seeks to provide stability in college sports.
Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college
The College Sports Commission is designed to regulate the NIL market but won’t have subpoena power to control rogue boosters.
The push from the NCAA and Power Five conferences to enact federal legislation regarding college sports is intensifying. House representatives Lisa McClain (R-Mich.)and Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.) introduced the “College Student-Athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights,