Dallas-based Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access allege trespass, nuisance, defamation and other offenses by ...

The Dallas company Energy Transfer filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace in 2017, accusing the organization of inciting and ...

In a closely watched case, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline is claiming the environmental group masterminded protests ...

A Texas-based company claims the environmental advocacy group tried to delay construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline with ...

Greenpeace has said that a lawsuit brought by an energy company over the Dakota Access Pipeline could wipe it out. The ...

A Texas pipeline company has sued Greenpeace accusing the organization of defamation, disruptions and attacks during protests ...

The case, filed by pipeline developer Energy Transfer, accuses Greenpeace of defaming the company while funding and supporting some protesters who damaged its property. On its face, the trial is ...

A group of attorneys, activists and academics will be monitoring an upcoming trial between the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline and Greenpeace to evaluate whether the proceedings comply ...

Filed in state court, legal action accuses Greenpeace of an “unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer, physical harm to its employees and infrastructure, and to disrupt ...

Richard Bluecloud Castaneda / Greenpeace A civil trial commences on February 24 that will determine whether Greenpeace must pay $300 million in damages to Energy Transfer Partners, the corporation ...